Game 150: The Crew

Wednesday, Nov. 13
Wyoming High School, Wyoming, Mich.

calvin-johnson-play-800
Remember this? Back judge Dino Paganelli made the famous no-catch call on the apparent Calvin Johnson touchdown in 2010. Last February he worked the Super Bowl. (Peter Read Miller/Sports Illustrated)

There have been some controversial calls in our time. Can you think of one more controversial than the Calvin Johnson didn’t-complete-the-action-of-a-catch-while-going-to-the-ground play that decided the Lions-Bears game on opening day 2010? Johnson caught what appeared to be the winning touchdown pass at Chicago, took a couple of steps while falling, used the ball to brace his fall, and the ball popped free when it contacted the ground. The back judge on the play, the man whose call it was, Dino Paganelli, ruled no catch. Upon review, the referee, Gene Steratore, upheld Paganelli’s call, and the Lions lost the game.

Dino Paganelli


Back Judge


Age: 46  Home: Wyoming, Mich.  Years as NFL official: 8.  Outside job: High school history and phys ed teacher.  Crew role: Makes Saturday night dinner reservation on the road.  Personality: Quiet, patient, unflappable, always sure of his call.

 

Q: In light of the death of your wife, Christine, in 2011 [to melanoma], how do you view the pressure you face on the field?  Paganelli: “Officiating isn’t pressure. Pressure is getting home at midnight Sunday from a game and making sure there’s milk in the refrigerator for breakfast for the kids, and making sure their clothes are washed and ready for the week.’’

Paganelli returned that night to his home in Wyoming, Mich., next to Grand Rapids, two hours west of Detroit. Lions country. And the next day he headed to his job as a teacher at Wyoming High.

“Oftentimes I get more harassment from my students in phys ed class than I do from players on the field,” Paganelli says. “That Monday the students wouldn’t talk to me, they wouldn’t listen to me. They just shut down; they wouldn’t let me teach. Then you try to explain what the rule and the process is, and they’re not buying it. To this day, when I call a foul in flag football, it’s, ‘Oh, that’s the Calvin Johnson referee.’ ”

So much for home (ref) cooking. As onerous as you might find the rule in the Calvin Johnson play, if the Michigan guy doesn’t call the play the way he did, the Michigan guy would have gotten a downgrade from the league office when grades were made official three days later. A few downgrades and you won’t officiate in the playoffs. A few more and you’ll be quietly let go after the season. As one of the members of Steratore’s crew, head linesman Wayne Mackie, a New Yorker, says, “I like my job. You think I’m going to risk it by throwing flags for the Jets when I work a Jets game?” This is a subject the seven officials on the crew bring up quite often, usually shaking their heads in incredulity. “At the end of the game, most times, we don’t even know the score,” Mackie says.

“It’s about personal integrity,” Paganelli says, “and protecting the NFL shield.”

Now for Paganelli’s weekday job. On this day at Wyoming High, the Calvin Johnson referee—who is a phys ed and AP History teacher when not on an NFL field—has put today’s assignment on the blackboard in this middle-class ’burb. It would fit nicely in a college-frosh History 101 class.

AP History Writing Prompt
Analyze the political, diplomatic and military reasons
for the United States’ victory in the Revolutionary War.
(Confine your response to the period 1775-1783.)
* Be prepared to present your message to the group.

The students break into small study groups for the last half-hour of the period. “Challenge yourself,” Mr. Paganelli says. “Work with people you haven’t worked with in the past.” As the kids pick small teams, Paganelli walks from group to group with advice and ideas.

Paganelli in his AP History class at Wyoming High. His students can be tougher on him after games than NFL players. (John DePetro/The MMQB)
Paganelli in his AP History class at Wyoming High in Michigan. His students, he says, can be tougher on him after games than NFL players are. (John DePetro/The MMQB)

Big dreams among the 30 students in here. Two boys in ties sit attentively. One of the girls hopes to be admitted to Northwestern; another is leaning toward the University of Washington. When Paganelli took over the class, he found there was a great emphasis on testing. “I was told, ‘You’ve got to kill Lincoln by Thanksgiving,’ ” he says. “That’s tough. I’m not a fan of testing twice a week. I’m a fan of thinking. Kids have to learn to think.’’

Critical thinking. For a back judge it’s vital. Paganelli, who worked last year’s Super Bowl, is the last line of defense on the Steratore crew. He has to think fast on interference calls, and he has to think faster on catch/no-catch and boundary plays. He has to watch for the kinds of helmet-to-helmet hits, and hits on defenseless receivers, that have become a flashpoint in officiating in the past three years. He watches for those after he monitors the 40-second play clock (it’s his primary call if it expires), count the number of defensive players after final substitutions are made, and figure out which receiver is his in the multiple-receiver formations that dominate the game today.

Bill Schuster


Umpire   Age: 55 Home: Livonia, N.Y. Years as NFL official: 14. Outside job: Owner, property and casualty insurance agency.
Crew role:
Keeps guys loose. Throws barbs particularly at Steratore, Weatherford to cut tension. Personality: Confident. Peacekeeper.   Q: What is it like for an umpire to control the trenches? Schuster: “We get called a lot of names. But there are players who help us police the problems. I have guys on the field I can go to to help me keep the peace.”

It’s one of the more complicated elements of the game for an officiating crew, and one we never think about. With motion and multiple-receiver sets and backs flanked out and tight ends split wide, how do the seven men figure out who’s watching which players? Say the offense comes out with three receivers to the right and one to the left. In this case, the side judge takes the widest receiver, the head linesman the middle man and Paganelli, the back judge, takes the receiver closest to the formation. The field judge takes the lone receiver on the left.

Now, say one of the three from the right goes in motion. Once he crosses the center of the formation and relocates to the left, Paganelli would switch to the closest receiver to the formation on the referee’s side—usually the offensive right side.

Now, say the three receivers stay in a bunch to the right, either stacked or too close to figure left, right and middle in the second or two before the snap. “Then,” says Paganelli, “we let them declare as they run upfield. It’s a feel play then. The side judge will take the receiver who goes to the outside, or becomes the widest of the three. The head linesman takes the short receiver or the receiver to the flat. The back judge takes the receiver who heads upfield or becomes the third receiver if they declare their routes quick. But most of the time the back judge will take the receiver coming straight upfield.”

Now, say it’s an all-go out of a bunch formation, with all three men sprinting upfield together. Again, it has to be a feel thing: Just think, side judge on the outside receiver, head linesman the next one in, and the back judge the third one.

“That’s one of the reasons why it’s important to have crew chemistry,” says Paganelli. “There are so many things that happen suddenly, and you need to know how your partners are going to see things, so you know what your assignment is going to be.”

When Paganelli goes home from school every day, he enters a far different, far more difficult world. In 2011, his wife, Christine, died at age 40 of melanoma. The disease dragged on for a couple years, and it was torturous for Dino and her, mostly because of their three children. Now Brady is 14, Jake 13 and Katelyn 6. It’s like you’d think: Every day’s a struggle, even in the day-to-day normalcy of the family routine two-and-a-half years later. Jake wants a cell phone. Katelyn needs Dad home when she steps off the school bus just before 4. Life with three kids. On this day, Paganelli’s mother, Mary, is here to take Jake to basketball practice and to oversee Katelyn’s play date.

Paganelli has NFL homework to do at the dining room table, his NFL-issued Surface tablet set up to review some plays from Sunday and look ahead to Game 150. Before he does, I ask him about life as a single dad raising three kids.

“I’m lucky to have all the help and support I have from two families,” he says. “Without that I’d be lost. But if there came a time that I had to step away because of my family, I wouldn’t think twice about it.” The pressure on the field, he says, doesn’t compare to the pressure of raising three kids as a single parent. As he says: “Officiating isn’t pressure. Pressure is getting home at midnight Sunday from a game and making sure there’s milk in the refrigerator for breakfast for the kids, and making sure their clothes are washed and ready for the week.’’

Doorbell rings. Paganelli looks around. No one answers it. He goes to the door, and there’s a little girl. “Is Katelyn home?” she says. Paganelli lets her in, and she and Katelyn have some fun in the den while he goes back to his tablet.

My question is about the hot-button issue of today: How do you officiate the bang-bang calls in the secondary, with the emphasis on player safety? How do you see the helmet-to-helmet hits at full speed? How do you divine what is a hit on a defenseless receiver, with players moving as fast as they do?

Mike Weatherford


Side Judge


Age: 54  Home: Edmund, Okla.  Years as NFL official: 12.  Outside job: Marketing, oil and gas business.  Crew role: Banker—collects for Saturday night meal, tips for stadium workers.  Personality: Steely, reserved, unshakeable.

 

Q: Do you feel extra responsibility as the lone Native American (he is a Chickasaw) official in the NFL?  Weatherford: “I had relatives run out of Mississippi on the Trail of Tears. So to be an NFL official, to work the Super Bowl especially, is such an honor. Not only for me, but for my entire family and for the Chickasaw Nation. Seeing my family at the Super Bowl is one of the thrills of my life.”

“I’ve got a good example for you, to show you how tough it is,” he says. For this, Paganelli hits his touch screen, and here’s the Week 4 Arizona-Tampa Bay game, with the Steratore crew working. Late in the second quarter, Bucs tight end Tim Wright catches a pass up the right seam from Mike Glennon, and Cardinals safety Yeremiah Bell comes and blasts Wright in the upper torso—and maybe the head. Wright’s head snaps back. A flag comes flying in, but not from Paganelli. There’s a crew conference. Paganelli says he thinks Bell hit Wright low enough; legally. Others think differently. Line judge Jeff Seeman threw the flag, and his argument in the conference wins. Pretty understandable. From where he stood, Seeman saw the violent collision, and Wright’s head snapping back, at a high rate of speed. Steratore announces, “Personal foul, unnecessary roughness, hit on a defenseless receiver … ”

Paganelli plays it over a few times. “Here, I’m looking for the missile, because we’ve been challenged by the league to improve our recognition on plays like this. Let’s watch …” Now it runs two, three, four times. The more you see it, the more you see Bell putting his head to the side, so as not to hit Wright with it. And you see his shoulder pads nail Wright in the upper-sternum/shoulder-pad area. There doesn’t appear to be any contact with the head. The head just snaps back because of the jarring hit to the upper torso. There’s something about watching these plays over and over and over again. Steratore put it best. “Sometimes,” the ref said, “it’s like you’re watching the Zapruder film and trying to figure out what exactly happened.”

“This is not a foul,” Paganelli says. And I believe he’s right. “You see 37 uses his shoulder, not his head, and go shoulder-to-shoulder.’’

On the TV copy of the game, FOX’s Sam Rosen intones: “If there’s a mistake, they’re going to err on the side of player safety.” He’s spot on.

“I do think defensive players are getting better,” Paganelli says. “We have become much more sensitized to the hits, and we’re better at recognizing them. Defensive players are playing smarter; I’m sure of it.’’

Postscript: The league supported the call, and didn’t give a downgrade to either official, Seeman or Paganelli, because it was so close. “Support” usually means the call was technically incorrect but so close they’re not going to sanction either official.

“There’s a quote from Pat Riley that I like,” Paganelli says. “ ‘I know I’m good. I know I can get better.’ That really says a lot about our jobs.”

Yes, it does. But after three days of looking at close calls, my conclusion on the “I can get better” angle is this: It doesn’t matter how good you get. Officials are still going to miss some, or quite a few. On the play in the Bucs-Cards game, two smart officials saw it in real time, and saw it exactly differently. Earlier in the week I had watched a play with Steratore for 15 minutes before feeling convinced it wasn’t a foul—and even then Steratore wasn’t convinced he wasn’t going to get downgraded for it.

Mistakes are going to happen. And there’s precious little these guys can do about it.

* * *

PREV 1 2 3NEXT VIEW AS A SINGLE PAGE
59 comments
mschu74
mschu74

guys my dad is Bill Schuster

surfphillips
surfphillips

What a pile of crap.  This guy blew the final call on Miami Pittsburg a few years ago.  (Mr upon further review, the quarterback did fumble but I didnt see who recovered. the ball.)  This guy is a joke and a disgrace to good referee's everywhere

JohnFerguson
JohnFerguson

The best writing that Peter King has done in a long time. The juices must have been flowing on this story. The NFL was wise to let the fans have a "behind the scenes" look at officiating. Nicely done Mr. King. 

MatthiasGiese
MatthiasGiese

Be that as it may I watched football today and saw another collection of horrible, horrible calls (not just my impression, those of the commentators). Some of them were game deciding. I´m sorry. I´ve loved American Football for almost thirty years, my son plays flag, I have really believed in the game but this is quickly becoming untenable. We have a Game Pass, but I don´t think we´ll be back next season. The wonderful game of American Football is self destructing. 

chetjohnson
chetjohnson

Peter King use to be a fantastic and brilliant writer.  Reading MMQB on Monday's was always a must and a joy to read.  Then he drank the "it's all about me" and I'm a TV star Kool-Aid and the MMQB became more about him and his varied social opinions than about the NFL.  I now read only bits and pieces of what he writes but was very interested when I saw the promos for Game 150.  I sat down this morning to read this feature article and was reminded again of what a thought provoking and brilliant writer Peter King still is.  I know there are many people like myself who have quit reading Peter King for some or even different reasons than I did.  That said, I would encourage everyone to read Game 150.  Thank you Peter for the rare insight, it was a great and educational read. 

Fred24
Fred24

Peter: I am not fan of yours, because oftentimes you pander to what is presently trendy, and certainly no fan of NFL officiating that is for sure, which I find a death knell to the integrity of the NFL because if it is so chancy and unpredictable that the NFL is now a 'game show of chance' not one of rewarding effort and/or excellence.It has enough of a luck factor as is; i.e. injuries. Nonetheless, I found your piece a very good read and enlightening.


Here is two new ways of ~thinking~ the NFL must do to raise the level of officiating:

1. IF in doubt ~DON'T~ throw that flag. Most are now operating under the opposite mantra - again if not sure then don't throw a flag.

2. NO rule should be enacted, no matter how well-intended,  that is so chancy and difficult to apply that it will directly lead to inconsistent in application. Why? Because it will directly lead to influencing the outcome of the game, especially now when the talent among teams is so even and thus the games so tight. The NFL season is ~only~ 16 games, the 'breaks or the damage' done by incorrect or inconsistency of officiating do not have a mathematical chance to 'even' out by virtue of such a few games ~within~ a single season.

Also, technology is now five times more advanced then before, and it never lies, then why not use it - at all times.


The problem is one of intellectual adjustment (evolution) to a new reality, not that human error be eliminated,or lessen. It can't.

James Kempner
James Kempner

Congratulations. This is a terrific piece and goes a long way to make their job more understandable. (I've only read the 1st 2 parts so far) Nevertheless I think the NFL needs to improve the officiating. If a fan can see a bad call or non-call on their TV why can't the NFL? Because they don't have an 8th official watching TV like a fan?

.

Poch_DLR
Poch_DLR

I'm a sports writer myself and I'd like to commend Mr. King on this great article knowing how much work it takes to have written it.

Would you please be able to feature Ed Hochuli? Many fans would love that!

Willmac7496
Willmac7496

I didn't think I'd be interested but once I started reading I had to read the whole thing.   Very well written and interesting, and some of these guys have really hard lives during the week too

DennyCrane
DennyCrane

Ooh, "embedded" with the refs; why that's almost like being "embedded" with a real military unit in a real theater of war where the correspondent is exposed to the same level of hazards as the unit they're with. Why Peter, that sounds so dangerous and heroic.

I'm more interested in the referring screw ups like the failure to flag Tomlin of the inability for the crew to get 3rd down or 1st down like the Redskins experienced in their final drive. I'd rather know what the league is going to do about that and how they're going to put some integrity into the officiating. These are major screw ups and heads should roll but all we hear is "mistakes were made".

Next time Peter, pick a topic which is significant and newsworthy instead of some fluff piece for the league. Why it's almost as if they planned this article to hide their ghastly attempts at officiating at a professional level.

badcyclist1
badcyclist1

Great article so far.  You could not pay me enough to do their job, though.

Django
Django

Wow. This continues to be a fascinating series. One of the better so far on MMQB and that's saying something.

On some level I knew that officials took their job seriously and also had day jobs...but reading the details makes a much bigger impression. Looking forward to the next parts of the series.

George
George

refs suck.  Brought to you by peter "no-neck" king sponsored by Microsoft.

Be sure to "bing" on your "Surface Tablet"  - peter says so! (cha-CHING!)


RTR
RTR

we need addresses and phone numbers.

Mark20
Mark20

Ive noticed that the people enjoying this are all ex-officials. You know why? Because the rest of us could give a crap. What's next, the lives of beer vendors at NFL stadiums? Go on, keep giving these guys headlines. Pretty soon they will be calling lots more penalties to get more camera time. Great work.

pirate
pirate

Outstanding. The kind of reporting that is both human and intellectual, lets us see the refs as people, and understand what they do and how they impact this game we all love.

Hotstover
Hotstover

As a ten-year high school football official, I find this series absolutely fascinating! We do some of the things these guys do, but on a Little League scale comparatively. I find the high school speed pretty fast sometimes - I can't even imagine what it's like trying to do it at the NFL level. And just like you all - I yell at the officials on TV as well, but deep down, I at least understand what a tough job they have to do! As a Dolphins fan, I have had it out for Steratore since the 2010 Pittsburgh debacle, but, at the same time, I know what he does isn't easy, and when people make actual personal threats to him, that's way over the line. Sports is entertainment, not real life (for the fans, anyways), and we should leave our anger w/in that entertainment spectrum/reality. Make no mistake, these guys get calls wrong, and will continue to, but they are human, work very hard at their craft and - bottom line - it's a craft that is extremely difficult to do at a high level! Appreciate that when you watch games this Sunday!

Epacific
Epacific

Excellent, excellent series!  While I had assumed that the officials had some type of self-monitoring mechanism along with their daily pre-game abulations, I was completely clueless about the extent of their preparations and evaluations.  I think this series helps everyone: the players( who will better understand the lengths the refs go to get the calls right), the fans (who will have a better idea of the ref's perspective and, hopefully, be more hesitant of unthinkingly blaming any call that goes against their team), and the referees themselves (who should get some long overdue appreciation for all of their efforts.)  Peter, you deserve a nice tall cold one (or a hot mocha as the case may be).

Rickapolis
Rickapolis

Don't the refs know that you are supposed to STAY OFF THE WHITE BORDER??? Oh, wait, that is just the coaches who want to trip players. Never mind.

JMillerNC
JMillerNC

Love this series.  It really puts perspective on the job of the officials.  Great work, Peter.

TravisHastings
TravisHastings

I get the purpose behind this article, but I'm still of the philosophy that refs should be nearly invisible. I don't want to know their names, their families, their jobs, hopes, aspirations, or dreams. Maybe it's my love the NBA and the massive officiating problem with that sport that has made up my mind. Officials should by anonymous and should only be accountable to the league, not fans. Don't put the officials name on screen, don't put his crew's name on the screen. 

zzcraigzz
zzcraigzz

I wonder whether SI is paid by Microsoft, or if King is just getting a kickback on the side. What possible purpose does it serve to the story to mention each day that the NFL issued tablet is specifically a "Surface Tablet"?

StephenGrange
StephenGrange

Utterly fascinating..Thanks for the article.

manan.shah23
manan.shah23

I want to commend you on this series. It is a thoughtful look at the behind the scenes work and responsibility that refs have. More than that, it showcases the amount of time and effort they put into their position and not just show up at the games on a Sunday.  Really thoughtful and hopefully will show refs in a better light than some people might see them in. Really well done, Peter & team. 

surfphillips
surfphillips

I am on my way to sons flag practice and I know how you feel.

doyleholland
doyleholland

@Fred24 Reading all four of your comments here, I find myself in general agreement, and have only these comments to add:


1. I believe that 2 coaches challenges are insufficient. The number should be increased to 3 per half, and teams should not be penalized with the loss of a timeout if a challenge is not upheld. And I absolutely believe that the archaic rule that certain calls cannot be reviewed must be abolished.


2. The upstairs official must be supplemented with a team. It shouldn't just be one person. This team must be given direct access to all of the broadcast crews audio and video communications feeds so they can monitor individual players and their interactions in real-time and immediately alert the onfield official to something he may not be noticing.


3. Onfield officials must wear voice communications equipment that enables them to talk at all times with (a) each other, (b) their upstairs officials, and (c) with the coaches and quarterbacks of each team.


As you so aptly note, technology (of all forms) is much more advanced. The video and audio equipment used by the television crews is highly capable. There is no reason why the onfield officials must be forced to run to each other to talk face-to-face, or run to the sidelines to speak to the coaches.

Fred24
Fred24

BTW ALL calls should be subject to challenge, with the 2 per half limitation.  Pass Interference and now the infamous 'Roughing the Passer' (at least how now is applied), these two alone will change the outcome of a close game in the last 3 minutes 90% of the time.

pirate
pirate

@Mark20 I'm not an official or ex-official. Haven't played football since sophomore year in high school, more years ago than I care to recall. This series is fascinating. If you don't want to understand the inner workings of an integral part of the game, don't read it. But please, don't show your ignorance with comments like that.

Mark20
Mark20

@TravisHastings Completely with you on this. How about an article on how the waterboys and towel guys live and how they affect the game. LOL.

jnelso1922
jnelso1922

@TravisHastings I don't know how not knowing who they are is classified as old school, I may not always know the line judge or back judge, but you always know who the referee is, especially in the NBA/NHL and umpires in baseball. Whether it's this crew or a nameless/faceless crew it's interesting to know how they perform the work they do and what they also may do around it.

buffsblg
buffsblg

@TravisHastings Totally disagree. They are a vital part of the game and understanding that they are people and the way they do their job makes me a more informed viewer. Having them as anonymous robots would not prevent the moronic abuse they take.  

Domer88
Domer88

@zzcraigzz I noticed that, too.  Parts One and Two mentioned Surface Tablet, like a really bad product placement in a movie.


RA_Chiefsfan
RA_Chiefsfan

@Reedster2185 Patriots favorable calls? How about how if 31 other teams run pick plays it's illegal and results in a penalty but when Manning and Denver do it then it goes down as a great play?

Fred24
Fred24

Lastly, add a quick-minded head official upstairs at all games who can quickly interject his opinion when the Refs get too confused. This was going to be adopted this season and then somehow got 'lost' in the shuffle. Madden was talking about this on Sirius yesterday.



Mark20
Mark20

@pirate @Mark20 It's an opinion. I love football and the mental aspects of the game. So it is NOT ignorance. It's an opinion that states, "I don't care about refs, I care about players and teams". Ignorance is believing that as you spotlight the officials, that that won't affect their understanding of their roles. They can become prima donnas. Don't tell me you haven't watched a game (remember the Seahawks vs. Steelers SB?) where refs think they need to take over the game. Keep this up and it will get worse.

pirate
pirate

@Domer88 @zzcraigzz On the other hand, it's those telling details a writer looks for that let the reader make a more complete picture. I'm a Mac guy myself, so Microsoft details make me flinch, but it's the kind of thing that lets you visualize it better.

Fred24
Fred24

One thing for sure - officiating MUST be changed if the NFL is to be taken seriously after this season.

pirate
pirate

@George @Mark20 @pirate (Sigh.) But if you read the story, you see how seriously they take their jobs, how important not just being impartial but being seen as being impartial, is to them. This series is so filled with information about how they work and what they do, it will change the way I watch football. And part of the story, especially in the first installment, was all the systems in place to prevent exactly what you so worry about. 

UrsaMajor
UrsaMajor

@George @Mark20 @pirate Are you two so insecure about yourselves that you have to resort to personal attacks?  You are obviously both free not to read an article about referees, but seem to have some neurotic compulsion to read, and then pepper your opinions with personal attacks.

Pretty soon you guys will have your own reality TV show, competing with Duck Dynasty and the Kardashians if you keep this up.

George
George

@Mark20 @pirate Your point is well taken.  Refs should be anonymous / invisible.   That's all we need, is some prima dona attention-ho refs, vying for status and camera time.

But then look who wrote this POS.  The biggest attention-ho of all time.  Thinks we care about his beers, his coffee, and "things he thinks he thinks."  no-neck skunk.

Richard B
Richard B

@zzcraigzz @pirate @Domer88 I think it is critical to the story to say that the NFL pays for technology for their refs. The refs are using a tablet provided by the NFL and not a VCR from the attic :)

zzcraigzz
zzcraigzz

@pirate @zzcraigzz @Domer88 You do realize that Microsoft is a corporate sponsor of thier site. One mention, sure, maybe. But each article has to point out that the NFL issues a product of their core site sponsor, it is a fair question to bring up.

pirate
pirate

@zzcraigzz @pirate @Domer88 No, although the Coke can IS an iconic image. On the whole I'd rather have too much detail than too little. When he mentioned the tablet by name, in your mind didn't you see the Microsoft desktop? It's part of the picture I see when I'm reading. I don't believe (and can't believe you do) that Microsoft actually paid for the mention. That's just hyperbole. It might be interesting to know if the NFL bought the tablets, or if Microsoft donated them as a marketing tool. But of course that's outside the purview of this story.

zzcraigzz
zzcraigzz

@pirate @Domer88 @zzcraigzz . Next you are going to tell me it was critical to the story to know whether or not that cola Steratore had with dinner on Friday was a Coke or a Pepsi? Guess the big beverage companies weren't willing to provide some cash (Steratore endorsing Coke doesn't carry the same weight as the NFL), so you will never get that critical bit of info to fully understand his dinner.

Newsletter